Want to Subscribe?
Read Corporate India and add to your Business Intelligence
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc86a/dc86a2d52f94d13b6271d864f2cfce02bec71bc5" alt=""
Unlock Unlimited Access
Published: Dec 29, 2021
Updated: Dec 29, 2021
The PLI (production linked incentive) scheme for various industries has been announced over the last few months, though the initial push was provided in 2020. The government is focused on furthering the pace of investment in industry and offering incentives which are linked with performance. In this context, the broad contours of the PLI need to be understood along with the goals being pursued by the government at the macro level. It is interesting to also juxtapose information of how these industries have fared on investment, sales and employment in the past to fathom the challenge that lies ahead for these companies when leveraging the incentive being given by the government.
According to a recent study by Care Ratings, PLI is a scheme which gives incentives in terms of cash to various companies which is earmarked to the turnover that is generated over a period. The incentive could vary between 4-6% of turnover for most categories and can go up September 30, 2021 Corporate India 25 to 10% for some products. This is conditional on a certain amount of incremental investment being undertaken over a period of between 4-6 years with FY21 or FY22 being the base year (this will vary depending on when the scheme is announced). The company is also expected to generate a certain amount of incremental output. In this process, the government has also spoken of the number of jobs that can be potentially created assuming all the targets, including the incentive buffer, are fully utilized.
According to the government, all the PLI schemes covering 13 sectors with an outlay of Rs 1.97 lakh crore will ultimately lead to a minimum additional production of Rs 37.5 lakh crore over 5 years and a minimum expected additional employment over 5 years of nearly 1 crore. Assuming a value-added to sales ratio of 35% for the corporate sector, this would mean around Rs 13 lakh crore of nominal GDP being added over 5 years, which is around Rs 2.6 lakh crore per annum. India’s GDP in nominal terms in FY22 is targeted to be Rs 223 lakh crore. This would be about a 1.1% increase in annual nominal GDP.
Based on the press releases put out for some of the industries, the table gives the indicative goals to be achieved under the PLI scheme. The government has made projections on the amount of investment that is expected to take place, as well as the turnover that would be generated over the period coinciding with the PLI scheme for various industries. Wherever mentioned, these targets have been included in the table. For both investment and turnover/production, the numbers are incremental for the time- frame that is associated with the sector’s scheme. To get an idea of the annual numbers, these amounts should be divided by the time- frame mentioned alongside. For auto and components, Rs 57,042 crore is targeted as per the November 2020 plan.
Table A is only illustrative of the sectors covered under PLI and the allocations made for around 5 years. The disbursements will depend on how many companies qualify for this incentive based on their performance and hence will vary over the years. The PLI scheme makes allowances for slippages in years due to changes in the environment. While prima facie the government could be allocating around Rs 40,000 crore over 5 years for this project, the actual outflows will be dependent on the actual performance indicators of the companies.
A sample of 2,269 companies, which excludes the BFSI sector, has been considered for this analysis. The 26 Corporate India September 30, 2021 year chosen is 2020 where incremental plant and machinery has been considered, which is the main component of the PLI scheme as land is not included as investment. FY20 is the pre-pandemic year and hence removes the bias in the numbers. The sample consists of all the large companies but would exclude the unorganized sector and the smaller companies. This should not affect the analysis as the PLI is talking of large doses of investment materialising in the next 4-6 years, which cannot be driven by the smaller units.
The industries here are broader than the specific products which are covered under PLI, as the scheme is specific to individual products within an industry. But the broader groups give an idea of how challenging the task is for generating output/investment in the next 5 years or so. Alongside is also given the head count changes that have been witnessed in FY20 for this sector. The numbers reported are those given in annual reports and hence would normally include only the permanent employees, or rather the direct headcount. These numbers can be juxtaposed with the targets put forth by the PLI scheme to gauge how achievable will be these numbers.
Overall, there was an increase of Rs 3.10 lakh crore in plant and machinery in FY20 for the sample companies. The top 5 industries accounted for Rs 2.31 lakh crore of this investment and included refineries (Rs 1.25 lakh crore), power generation (Rs 0.58 lakh crore), iron and steel products (Rs 0.19 lakh crore), telecom (Rs 0.16 lakh crore) and oil exploration (Rs 0.14 lakh crore).
In terms of employment, there was not much traction for the sample companies, and it declined from 60.80 lakh in FY19 to 60.02 lakh in FY20. In fact, job creation was witnessed to a significant extent only in the IT-software space. Overall sales for the sample companies had fallen from Rs 57.61 lakh crore in FY19 to Rs 54.80 lakh crore in FY20.
The sample companies have been classified under broader heads as the PLI at times relates to specific products, for which information is not available on the specific companies, as at times it would be part of an array of prod ucts that are offered. The data is indicative nonetheless of the performance of these broader sectors in the areas of investment and sales in FY20, with some indication on the employment count.
The table B shows that these broad sectors did witness a slowdown in sales at the aggregate level though food products, pharma, electronics and consumer durables did witness growth. But for investment, the picture was impressive with around Rs 54,000 crore being incremental plant and machinery for this sample. Almost all sectors witnessed growth in plant and machinery, which is a good sign. For all these sectors taken together, investment is expected to be in the region of Rs 55,000-65,000 crore on an annual basis, which will require a major internal push for companies in these sectors.
Again, in terms of employment there was less traction with steel products showing some increase. Companies have been relying a lot on technology to enhance productivity and hence job creation will have to be taken up by the SME sector in particular, which was buffeted by the two lockdowns in the last two years.
PLI hence can be viewed as a progressive step to bring about acceleration in investment and hence production for the targeted sectors. PLI is in fact providing the push towards new green products both for solar power as well as electric vehicles, which are presently not dominant in this group of companies. Therefore, the fructification of this scheme would lead to more organized eco-friendly diversification in industry.
The PLI can be looked at as being a scheme that not just boosts production but has great potential to lower dependence on imports. In particular, the imports of electronics can come down, which is a major group after POL (petroleum, oil, lubricants) in the import bill. In FY21, total imports were $ 56.7 bn, of which computer hardware ($ 10.4 bn), telecom equipment ($ 14.8 bn), electronic instruments ($ 7.4 bn), consumer electronics ($ 4.5 bn) and medical instruments ($ 4.1 bn) are the major components.
The total incentive being provided for electronics-based goods would be in the region of Rs 60-70,000 crore. This is around $ 9-9.5 bn over 4-6 years. Intuitively, if this helps to reduce the import bill by even 10% over this period, the incentive provided would have worked well.
The biggest challenge in this scheme is, however, job creation. The potential is evidently immense as laid out in the plans. But the organized sector that is largely covered here would provide the bulk of the thrust in most sectors in fulfilment of the targets. However, here the history of job creation has been weak. The PLI plan does not clearly talk of the employment targets in terms of direct and indirect job creation. It may be assumed that a substantial part which is more then 50-60% would be indirect. Also, in some sectors, the SMEs would be expected to take some initiative where the investment and turnover targets are not very large.
The PLI is a very progressive scheme which rewards performance. There is a push being given to the technology-driven sectors which will also have an impact on reducing imports at the margin. Some of the sectors have been linked directly with the ESG (environmental, social and governance) objectives like solar panels and EVs. But even conventional industries like textiles and food processing have been provided incentives.
Companies do have the advantage of a relatively low base year being used as a threshold on which incremental capital must be deployed and production enhanced, as FY20 and FY21 were relatively off-the-trend path years. If the targets are met, there is high potential to add to 1% of nominal GDP, which is significant.
February 15, 2025 - First Issue
Industry Review
Want to Subscribe?
Read Corporate India and add to your Business Intelligence
Unlock Unlimited Access
Lighter Vein
Popular Stories
Archives